Monday, April 8, 2013

Review of 'Good, Brother'

    Good, Brother is...

    • Brotherhood, family
    • Coming of age. A delicate dance between doing boy things and doing man things.
    • Clinging to a dying past; a struggle to keep home, home. 
    • Long, repetitive, cleverly interwoven sentences that drag the reader from scene to scene mercilessly by her hair.
    • Poetry? Probably prose poetry.
    • An examination and exploration of womanhood. Girl is larger than life, and she takes the brothers on journeys.
    • Violence- an extension of boyhood (it is as if the protagonists struggle to tear everything down just to build it back up again, to see what’s on the inside).
    • Girl- Hope, growth (sometimes literally), god, faith, spirituality, love, comfort.
    • Woman (mother)- Enemy of mud, change, the unknown, death.
    • Father- Grown up boy. 
    • Dark, gothic; Southern gothic?
    • Lord of the Flies-esque?

    Good, Brother is not...

    • Concise
    • "An easy read"
    • Light
    • To be taken for surface value. The symbols are not few and are not stagnant; they change with the development of the brothers (example: mud is mud, lifeblood, creation, destruction...)
    • A traditional text
    • One story
    • Linear
    • A book I will read again in full; though I find myself reading excerpts from time to time. 


3 comments:

  1. My problem with the format of this review is that Good, Brother, to me, does not seem like it can be so easily dichotomized. Like, it is on a level of multiples rather than a base level of what it "is and is not." Maybe a piece of paper with a bunch of imagistic words and phrases would be a more appropriate review for the style of the book. This seems like it would work for an academic text or a linear plot-based narrative.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I love that this is a pro and con list, but I agree with Ryan that I'm not sure the text can be so easily categorized.

    ReplyDelete
  3. excellent format, but I agree with the previous comments, I don't know if everything is so easily classified.

    ReplyDelete